[cite web | title=Embattled Academic Tony Judt Defends Call for Binational State| work=The Forward | url=http://www.forward.com/articles/embattled-academic-tony-judt-defends-call-for-bina/ | accessdate= May 17 | accessyear=2007] The problem, he began to believe, was that this view was "remarkably unconscious of the people who had been kicked out of the country and were suffering in refugee camps to make this fantasy possible."]
After completing his Bachelor's degree at Cambridge, Tony Judt pursued his studies under the auspices of the Ecole Normale Supérieure. His experiences in Paris contributed to what would become a long and fruitful relationship with the French political culture. His first book, "Socialism in Provence 1871-1914: A Study in the Origins of the French Modern Left", an “enquiry into a political tradition that shaped a nation” [Tony Judt, Socialism in Provence 1871-1914: A Study in the Origins of the Modern French Left, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.] was above all a social history. Intellectual and cultural currents – those of Marxism, in this case – are interpreted as the agents of political change. This approach which gives a special importance to human agency would become a hallmark of Tony Judt’s style.
Judt’s fascination with French political culture would result in three further studies, including "Marxism and the French Left: Studies in Labour and Politics in France 1830-1981" and "Past Imperfect: French Intellectuals, 1944-1956". In "Past Imperfect", he castigates French intellectuals of the postwar era for their “self-imposed moral amnesia.” ["Past Imperfect: French Intellectuals 1944-1956", Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992] Judt has criticized what he considered as a blind faith in Stalin’s communism. In Judt’s interpretation of the postwar belief system one can already discern a certain distaste, if not an outright hostility for the alleged myths on which postwar culture was founded. This disillusionment was the seminal idea in his early work; it would find an increasingly broad application in his subsequent writing.
Highly respected in the United States as a specialist of French history, his work has met much scepticism in FranceFact|date=May 2008. For instance, following the recognition by then President Jacques Chirac, in 1995, of the responsibility of the French state during the Collaboration, on the anniversary of the Vel'd'Hiv raid, he claimed in an op-ed published by "The New York Times" that:
"people like Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault were curiously silent. One reason was their near-obsession with Communism. While proclaiming the need to "engage," to take a stand, two generations of intellectuals avoided any ethical issue that could not advance or, in some cases, retard the Marxist cause.
Vichy was dismissed as the work of a few senile Fascists. No one looked closely at what had happened during the Occupation, perhaps because very few intellectuals of any political stripe could claim to have had a "good" war, as Albert Camus did. No one stood up to cry "J'accuse!" at high functionaries, as Emile Zola did during the Dreyfus affair. When Simone de Beauvoir, Roland Barthes and Jacques Derrida entered the public arena, it usually involved a crisis far away -- in Madagascar, Vietnam or Cambodia. Even today, politically engaged writers call for action in Bosnia but intervene only sporadically in debates about the French past. [ Tony Judt, [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE4DD1239F93AA25754C0A963958260 French War Stories] , "New York Times", July 19, 1995 ] "
In the years following the publication of "Past Imperfect", Tony Judt turned his attention to the wider issues of European history. Erich Maria Remarque’s widow bequeathed her fortune to NYU and thus the Institute of European Studies bearing her late husband’s name came into being under Judt’s direction. Judt's first publication of this period - the result of a speech delivered at the Johns Hopkins-SAIS Bologna Center in 1995 - was "A Grand Illusion?" In this extended essay, he deals directly with the European Union and its prospects for the future, which, in his view, were quite bleak. According to Judt, Europe’s sense of its divisions had long been one of the “defining obsessions of its inhabitants." [Tony Judt, A Grand Illusion? New York: Hill and Wang, 1996, p. 46] The benefits of unity were unevenly distributed and the regions it favored came to have more in common with each other than with their neighbors living in the same state. The Baden-Württemberg region in south-western Germany, the Rhône-Alpes region of France, Lombardy and Catalonia are evoked as examples of disproportionately rich “super-regions.” Another division, Judt claims, could be seen in the Schengen Agreement. Nothing more than a “highest common factor of discriminatory political arithmetic,” [Tony Judt, A Grand Illusion? New York: Hill and Wang, 1996, p. 125] the Schengen Agreement made Eastern European countries into barrier states designed to keep undesirable immigrants at bay. Similar dangers existed in eastern Europe where former critics of Soviet universalism deftly recycled themselves into anti-European, nationalist agitators. These problems, Judt writes, could only find their resolution in increased national intervention. States would be called upon to redistribute wealth and preserve the decaying social fabric of the societies they governed. This conception of the role of the state is carried over – albeit in slightly different form - into "Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945".
His 2005 book, "" examines the history of Europe from the end of World War II (1945) to 2005. Weighing in at nearly 900 pages, it has won considerable praise for its sweeping, encyclopedic scope [cite web | title="Postwar" by Tony Judt| work=Metacritic | url=http://www.metacritic.com/books/authors/judttony/postwar | accessdate= April 14 | accessyear=2006] and was a runner up for the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-fiction. [cite web|url=http://www.pulitzer.org/year/2006/general-non-fiction|title=The Pulitzer Prize Winners 2006: General NonFiction|accessdate=2006-10-29] Writing on such a broad subject was something of a departure for Judt, whose earlier works, such as "Socialism in Provence" and "Past Imperfect," had focused on challenging conventional assumptions about the French Left.
Judt is also known for his writings criticizing Israel and opposing its existence. Some of these writings have prompted strong responses from Israel's supporters, including his former friend Leon Wieseltier, who argued in the "New Republic" that Judt had neither the background nor intellectual detachment to make his case.Fact|date=August 2007
In 2003, Judt claimed in an article for the "New York Review of Books" argued that Israel was on its way to becoming a "belligerently intolerant, faith-driven ethno state." He called for the conversion of "Israel from a Jewish state to a binational one" which would include all of what is now Israel, Gaza, East Jerusalem and the West Bank. This proposed new state would have equal rights for all Jews and Arabs living in Israel and the Palestinian territories, [cite journal | id=ISSN 0028-7504 | date= 2003-10-23 | title=Israel: The Alternative | author= Judt, Tony| journal=New York Review of Books | volume=60 | issue=16 | url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/16671 | accessdate= 2006-04-17] The article drew strong criticism from those who saw such a plan as destroying Israel and replacing it with a predominantly Palestinian state governed by a Palestinian majority. [citeweb |url=http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=22&x_article=580|title=Judt Labels Israel "Anachronistic," Calls for Binational State|date=2003-10-17|accessdate=2006-10-22|publisher=Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA)] [cite news | author= Wieseltier, Leon | date = 2003-10-18 | title=Israel, Palestine, and the Return of the Bi-National Fantasy: What Is Not to Be Done | work=The New Republic Online | accessdate = 2006-10-22 | url=http://www.mafhoum.com/press6/165P51.htm] The "NYRB" was inundated with over a thousand letters within a week of the article's publication, and the article led to Judt's removal from the editorial board of "The New Republic." [cite web | title=Embattled Academic Tony Judt Defends Call for Binational State| work=The Forward | url=http://www.forward.com/articles/embattled-academic-tony-judt-defends-call-for-bina/ | accessdate= April 17 | accessdate=2006]
In March 2006 Judt wrote an op-ed piece for the "The New York Times" about the John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt paper entitled "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy". Judt argued that " [in] spite of [the paper's] provocative title, the essay draws on a wide variety of standard sources and is mostly uncontentious." He asked " [does] the Israel Lobby affect our foreign policy choices? Of course — that is one of its goals. [...] But does pressure to support Israel distort American decisions? That's a matter of judgment." He summed up his assessment of Mearsheimer and Walt's paper by asserting that "this essay, by two 'realist' political scientists with no interest whatsoever in the Palestinians, is a straw in the wind." He predicted that "it will not be self-evident to future generations of Americans why the imperial might and international reputation of the United States are so closely aligned with one small, controversial Mediterranean client state." [cite news | author=Judt, Tony | work=The New York Times | page=A21 | title=A Lobby, Not a Conspiracy | date=2006-04-19 | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/19/opinion/19judt.html?ex=1303099200&en=309d2e3dc279ff48&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss|accessdate=2006-11-03]
In May 2006, Judt continued in a similar vein with a feature-length article entitled "The Country That Wouldn't Grow Up" for the Israeli newspaper "Haaretz." [cite news | title=The Country That Wouldn't Grow Up| work=Haaretz | url=http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/711997.html | accessdate= 2006-05-08 | date=2006-05-05 | author=Judt, Tony] The article, published on Israeli Independence Day, recaps Israel's short history, describing what Judt sees as a steady decline in Israel's credibility that began with the Six-Day War in 1967.
Because of his outspoken criticisms regarding Israel, Tony Judt was featured prominently in a critical essay "'Progressive' Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism" published by the American Jewish Committee.
In a March 2007 interview, Judt commented on the American need to block criticism of Israel as stemming from the rise of identity politics in the US. "I didn't think I knew until then just how deep and how uniquely American this obsession with blocking any criticism of Israel is. It is uniquely American." [cite news | title=Lunch with the FT: Tony Judt | work=The Financial Times | url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3824ee52-d316-11db-829f-000b5df10621.html | accessdate= 2007-03-19 | date= 2007-03-16 | author= Bowley, Graham|]
Speech cancellation controversy
On October 4, 2006, Judt's scheduled New York talk before the organization Network 20/20 was abruptly cancelled after Polish Consul Krzysztof Kasprzyk suddenly withdrew his offer of a venue following telephone calls from the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee. The consul later told a reporter that "I don't have to subscribe to the First Amendment." [cite news | title=Off Limits? Talk by Israel Critic Canceled | url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19550#fn1 | work=The Jewish Week | date=2006-10-06 | accessdate=2006-11-10] According to "The New York Sun", "the appearance at the Polish consulate was canceled after the Polish government decided that Mr. Judt's views critical of Israel were not consistent with Poland's friendly relations with the Jewish state." [cite news | title= Another Judt Appearance Abrubtly Canceled| url=http://www.nysun.com/article/40962?page_no=1 | work=The New York Sun | page= 1 | date=2006-10-05 | accessdate=2006-11-10]
According to the "Washington Post", the ADL and AJC had complained to the Polish consul that Judt was "too critical of Israel and American Jewry," though both organizations deny asking that the talk be canceled. ADL National Chairman Abraham Foxman called Judt's claims of interference "wild conspiracy theories." Kasprzyk told the "Washington Post" that "the phone calls were very elegant but may be interpreted as exercising a delicate pressure. That's obvious — we are adults and our IQs are high enough to understand that."
Judt, who had planned to argue that the Israel lobby in the US often stifled honest debate, called the implications of the cancellation "serious and frightening." He added that "only in America — not in Israel — is this a problem," charging that vigorous criticism of Israeli policy, acceptable in Israel itself, is taboo in the US. Of the ADL and AJC, he said, "These are Jewish organizations that believe they should keep people who disagree with them on the Middle East away from anyone who might listen." [cite news | title=In N.Y., Sparks Fly Over Israel Criticism| work=The Washington Post| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/08/AR2006100800817.html| accessdate=2006-10-09]
The cancellation brought support from a roster of academics and intellectuals who said there had been an attempt to intimidate and shut down free debate - seeming to Judt's supporters to prove the point that Judt had wanted to make. [cite news | title=Does Abe Foxman Have an Anti-Anti-Semite Problem? | work=The New York Times | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/14/magazine/14foxman.t.html?ex=1187496000&en=cbd75d6aaa626634&ei=5070 | date= 2007-01-14 | author= Traub, James |] Mark Lilla and Richard Sennett wrote a letter to Foxman in protest, which was signed by 114 people and published in the "New York Review of Books". [cite news | title=The Case of Tony Judt: An Open Letter to the ADL | work=The Financial Times | url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19550 | accessdate= 2007-03-19 | date= 2006-11-16 | author= Lilla, Mark & Sennett, Richard |]
In a later exchange on the subject in the New York Review of Books, Lilla and Sennet argued that "Even without knowing the substance of those 'nice' calls from the ADL and AJC, any impartial observer will recognize them as not so subtle forms of pressure." [cite news | title= http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19676 | url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19676 | work=New York Review of Books | date=2006-11-30 | accessdate=2006-11-10]
The ADL and AJC defended their decision to contact the Polish consulate and rejected Judt's characterization of them. Foxman accused his critics of themselves stifling free speech when "they use inflammatory words like 'threaten,' 'pressure,' and 'intimidate' that bear no resemblance to what actually transpired." He wrote that the "ADL did not threaten or intimidate or pressure anyone. The Polish consul general made his decision concerning Tony Judt's appearance strictly on his own." Foxman said that Judt has "taken the position that Israel shouldn't exist [and t] hat puts him on our radar," while David A. Harris, executive director of the AJC, said that he wanted to tell the consulate that the thrust of Judt's talk ran "contrary to the entire spirit of Polish foreign policy." [cite news | title= http://www.nysun.com/article/40962?page_no=1 | url=http://www.nysun.com/article/40962?page_no=1 | work=The New York Sun | page= 1 | date=2006-10-05 | accessdate=2006-11-10]
* Eric Hobsbawm
* Raymond Aron
* [http://www.nybooks.com/authors/274 "New York Review of Books"] - Articles authored by Judt
* [http://www.bu.edu/historic/hs/judt.html Historical Society, Boston University] - Interview with Judt on Europe
* [http://www.quadrant.org.au/php/article_view.php?article_id=2117 What History Teaches the Jews] by Peter Coleman, review of "Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945", Quadrant Magazine, July 2006, Volume L, Number 7-8
Источник: Tony Judt