Des·cartes (dā-kärtʹ), René. 1596-1650.
French mathematician, philosopher, and scientist who is considered the father of analytic geometry and the founder of modern rationalism. His main works, Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) and Principles of Philosophy (1644), include the famous dictum “I think, therefore I am.”
* * *
died Feb. 11, 1650, Stockholm, Swed.
French mathematician, scientist, and philosopher, considered the father of modern philosophy.
Educated at a Jesuit college, he joined the military in 1618 and traveled widely for the next 10 years. In 1628 he settled in Holland, where he would remain until 1649. Descartes's ambition was to introduce into philosophy the rigour and clarity of mathematics. In his Meditations on First Philosophy
(1641), he undertook the methodical doubt of all knowledge about which it is possible to be deceived, including knowledge based on authority, the senses
, and reason
, in order to arrive at something about which he can be absolutely certain; using this point as a foundation, he then sought to construct new and more secure justifications of his belief in the existence and immortality of the soul, the existence of God, and the reality of an external world. This indubitable point is expressed in the dictum Cogito ergo sum
("I think, therefore I am"). His metaphysical dualism
distinguished radically between mind, the essence of which is thinking, and matter, the essence of which is extension in three dimensions. Though his metaphysics is rationalistic (see rationalism
), his physics and physiology are empiricistic (see empiricism
) and mechanistic (see mechanism
). In mathematics, he founded analytic geometry
and reformed algebraic notation.
* * *
▪ French mathematician and philosopher
born March 31, 1596, La Haye, Touraine, France
died February 11, 1650, Stockholm, Sweden
French mathematician, scientist, and philosopher. Because he was one of the first to abandon scholastic Aristotelianism
, because he formulated the first modern version of mind-body dualism (mind–body dualism
), from which stems the mind-body problem, and because he promoted the development of a new science (Cartesianism
) grounded in observation and experiment, he has been called the father of modern philosophy. Applying an original system of methodical doubt, he dismissed apparent knowledge derived from authority, the senses, and reason and erected new epistemic foundations on the basis of the intuition that, when he is thinking, he exists; this he expressed in the dictum “I think, therefore I am” (best known in its Latin formulation, “ cogito, ergo sum
,” though originally written in French, “Je pense, donc je suis”). He developed a metaphysical dualism
that distinguishes radically between mind, the essence of which is thinking, and matter, the essence of which is extension in three dimensions. Descartes's metaphysics
is rationalist, based on the postulation of innate ideas (innate idea
) of mind, matter, and God, but his physics and physiology, based on sensory experience, are mechanistic and empiricist.
Early life and education
Although Descartes's birthplace, La Haye (now Descartes), France
, is in Touraine, his family connections lie south, across the Creuse River in Poitou, where his father, Joachim
, owned farms and houses in Châtellerault and Poitiers. Because Joachim was a councillor in the Parlement of Brittany in Rennes, Descartes inherited a modest rank of nobility. Descartes's mother died when he was one year old. His father remarried in Rennes, leaving him in La Haye to be raised first by his maternal grandmother and then by his great-uncle in Châtellerault. Although the Descartes family was Roman Catholic, the Poitou region was controlled by the Protestant Huguenots (Huguenot
), and Ch
âtellerault, a Protestant stronghold, was the site of negotiations over the Edict of Nantes (Nantes, Edict of
) (1598), which gave Protestants freedom of worship in France following the intermittent Wars of Religion between Protestant and Catholic forces in France. Descartes returned to Poitou regularly until 1628.
In 1606 Descartes was sent to the Jesuit college at La Flèche, established in 1604 by Henry IV
(reigned 1589–1610). At La Flèche, 1,200 young men were trained for careers in military engineering, the judiciary, and government administration. In addition to classical studies, science, mathematics, and metaphysics— Aristotle
was taught from scholastic commentaries—they studied acting, music, poetry, dancing, riding, and fencing. In 1610 Descartes participated in an imposing ceremony in which the heart of Henry IV, whose assassination that year had destroyed the hope of religious tolerance in France and Germany, was placed in the cathedral at La Flèche.
In 1614 Descartes went to Poitiers, where he took a law degree in 1616. At this time, Huguenot Poitiers was in virtual revolt against the young King Louis XIII
(reigned 1610–43). Descartes's father probably expected him to enter Parlement, but the minimum age for doing so was 27, and Descartes was only 20. In 1618 he went to Breda in the Netherlands, where he spent 15 months as an informal student of mathematics and military architecture in the peacetime army of the Protestant stadholder, Prince Maurice
(ruled 1585–1625). In Breda, Descartes was encouraged in his studies of science and mathematics by the physicist Isaac Beeckman (1588–1637), for whom he wrote the Compendium of Music
(written 1618, published 1650), his first surviving work.
Descartes spent the period 1619 to 1628 traveling in northern and southern Europe, where, as he later explained, he studied “the book of the world.” While in Bohemia in 1619, he invented analytic geometry, a method of solving geometric problems algebraically and algebraic problems geometrically. He also devised a universal method of deductive reasoning, based on mathematics, that is applicable to all the sciences. This method, which he later formulated in Discourse on Method (1637) and Rules for the Direction of the Mind (written by 1628 but not published until 1701), consists of four rules: (1) accept nothing as true that is not self-evident, (2) divide problems into their simplest parts, (3) solve problems by proceeding from simple to complex, and (4) recheck the reasoning. These rules are a direct application of mathematical procedures. In addition, Descartes insisted that all key notions and the limits of each problem must be clearly defined.
Descartes also investigated reports of esoteric knowledge, such as the claims of the practitioners of theosophy
to be able to command nature. Although disappointed with the followers of the Catalan mystic Ramon Llull (Llull, Ramon
) (1232/33–1315/16) and the German alchemist Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim (Agrippa von Nettesheim, Heinrich Cornelius
) (1486–1535), he was impressed by the German mathematician Johann Faulhaber (1580–1635), a member of the mystical society of the Rosicrucians (Rosicrucian
Descartes shared a number of Rosicrucian goals and habits. Like the Rosicrucians, he lived alone and in seclusion, changed his residence often (during his 22 years in the Netherlands, he lived in 18 different places), practiced medicine without charge, attempted to increase human longevity, and took an optimistic view of the capacity of science to improve the human condition. At the end of his life, he left a chest of personal papers (none of which has survived) with a Rosicrucian physician—his close friend Corneille van Hogelande, who handled his affairs in the Netherlands. Despite these affinities, Descartes rejected the Rosicrucians' magical and mystical beliefs. For him, this period was a time of hope for a revolution in science. The English philosopher Francis Bacon (Bacon, Francis, Viscount Saint Alban (or Albans
), Baron of Verulam) (1561–1626), in Advancement of Learning
(1605), had earlier proposed a new science of observation and experiment to replace the traditional Aristotelian science, as Descartes himself did later.
In 1622 Descartes moved to Paris. There he gambled, rode, fenced, and went to the court, concerts, and the theatre. Among his friends were the poets Jean-Louis Guez de Balzac (Balzac, Jean-Louis Guez de
) (1597–1654), who dedicated his Le Socrate chrétien
(1652; “Christian Socrates”) to Descartes, and Théophile de Viau (Viau, Théophile de
) (1590–1626), who was burned in effigy and imprisoned in 1623 for writing verses mocking religious themes. Descartes also befriended the mathematician Claude Mydorge (1585–1647) and Father Marin Mersenne (Mersenne, Marin
) (1588–1648), a man of universal learning who corresponded with hundreds of scholars, writers, mathematicians, and scientists and who became Descartes's main contact with the larger intellectual world. During this time Descartes regularly hid from his friends to work, writing treatises, now lost, on fencing and metals. He acquired a considerable reputation long before he published anything.
At a talk in 1628, Descartes denied the alchemist Chandoux's claim that probabilities are as good as certainties in science and demonstrated his own method for attaining certainty. The Cardinal Pierre de Bérulle (Bérulle, Pierre de
) (1575–1629)—who had founded the Oratorian
teaching congregation in 1611 as a rival to the Jesuits (Jesuit
)—was present at the talk. Many commentators speculate that Bérulle urged Descartes to write a metaphysics based on the philosophy of St. Augustine (Augustine, Saint
) as a replacement for Jesuit teaching. Be that as it may, within weeks Descartes left for the Netherlands, which was Protestant, and—taking great precautions to conceal his address—did not return to France for 16 years. Some scholars claim that Descartes adopted Bérulle as director of his conscience, but this is unlikely, given Descartes's background and beliefs (he came from a Huguenot province, he was not a Catholic enthusiast, he had been accused of being a Rosicrucian, and he advocated religious tolerance and championed the use of reason).
Residence in the Netherlands
Descartes said that he went to the Netherlands to enjoy a greater liberty than was available anywhere else and to avoid the distractions of Paris and friends so that he could have the leisure and solitude to think. (He had inherited enough money and property to live independently.) The Netherlands was a haven of tolerance, where Descartes could be an original, independent thinker without fear of being burned at the stake—as was the Italian philosopher Lucilio Vanini (1585–1619) for proposing natural explanations of miracles—or being drafted into the armies then prosecuting the Catholic Counter-Reformation
. In France, by contrast, religious intolerance was mounting. The Jews were expelled in 1615, and the last Protestant stronghold, La Rochelle, was crushed—with Bérulle's participation—only weeks before Descartes's departure. In 1624 the French Parlement passed a decree forbidding criticism of Aristotle on pain of death. Although Mersenne and the philosopher Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) did publish attacks on Aristotle without suffering persecution (they were, after all, Catholic priests), those judged to be heretics continued to be burned, and laymen lacked church protection. In addition, Descartes may have felt jeopardized by his friendship with intellectual libertines such as Father Claude Picot (d. 1668), a bon vivant known as “the Atheist Priest,” with whom he entrusted his financial affairs in France.
In 1629 Descartes went to the university at Franeker, where he stayed with a Catholic family and wrote the first draft of his Meditations
. He matriculated at the University of Leiden in 1630. In 1631 he visited Denmark with the physician and alchemist Étienne de Villebressieu, who invented siege engines, a portable bridge, and a two-wheeled stretcher. The physician Henri Regius (1598–1679), who taught Descartes's views at the University of Utrecht in 1639, involved Descartes in a fierce controversy with the Calvinist theologian Gisbertus Voetius (Voetius, Gisbertus
) (1589–1676) that continued for the rest of Descartes's life. In his Letter to Voetius
of 1648, Descartes made a plea for religious tolerance and the rights of man. Claiming to write not only for Christians but also for Turks—meaning Muslims, libertines, infidels, deists, and atheists—he argued that, because Protestants and Catholics worship the same God, both can hope for heaven. When the controversy became intense, however, Descartes sought the protection of the French ambassador and of his friend Constantijn Huygens (Huygens, Constantijn
) (1596–1687), secretary to the stadholder Prince Frederick Henry (Frederick Henry, Prince of Orange, Count of Nassau
) (ruled 1625–47).
In 1635 Descartes's daughter Francine was born to Helena Jans and was baptized in the Reformed Church in Deventer. Although Francine is typically referred to by commentators as Descartes's “illegitimate” daughter, her baptism is recorded in a register for legitimate births. Her death of scarlet fever at the age of five was the greatest sorrow of Descartes's life. Referring to her death, Descartes said that he did not believe that one must refrain from tears to prove oneself a man.
The World and Discourse on Method
In 1633, just as he was about to publish The World
(1664), Descartes learned that the Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei (Galileo
) (1564–1642) had been condemned in Rome for publishing the view that the Earth revolves around the Sun. Because this Copernican (Copernican system
) position is central to his cosmology and physics, Descartes suppressed The World
, hoping that eventually the church would retract its condemnation. Although Descartes feared the church, he also hoped that his physics would one day replace that of Aristotle in church doctrine and be taught in Catholic schools.
Descartes's Discourse on Method
(1637) is one of the first important modern philosophical works not written in Latin. Descartes said that he wrote in French so that all who had good sense, including women, could read his work and learn to think for themselves. He believed that everyone could tell true from false by the natural light of reason
. In three essays accompanying the Discourse
, he illustrated his method for utilizing reason in the search for truth in the sciences: in Dioptrics
he derived the law of refraction, in Meteorology
he explained the rainbow, and in Geometry
he gave an exposition of his analytic geometry
. He also perfected the system invented by François Viète for representing (symbol
) known numerical quantities with a
, … , unknowns with x
, … , and squares, cubes, and other powers with numerical superscripts, as in x2
, … , which made algebraic calculations much easier than they had been before.
In the Discourse
he also provided a provisional moral code (later presented as final) for use while seeking truth: (1) obey local customs and laws, (2) make decisions on the best evidence and then stick to them firmly as though they were certain, (3) change desires rather than the world, and (4) always seek truth. This code exhibits Descartes's prudential conservatism, decisiveness, stoicism, and dedication. The Discourse
and other works illustrate Descartes's conception of knowledge as being like a tree in its interconnectedness and in the grounding provided to higher forms of knowledge by lower or more fundamental ones. Thus, for Descartes, metaphysics
corresponds to the roots of the tree, physics to the trunk, and medicine, mechanics, and morals to the branches.
In 1641 Descartes published the Meditations on First Philosophy, in Which Is Proved the Existence of God and the Immortality of the Soul
. Written in Latin and dedicated to the Jesuit professors at the Sorbonne in Paris, the work includes critical responses by several eminent thinkers—collected by Mersenne from the Jansenist philosopher and theologian Antoine Arnauld (Arnauld, Antoine
) (1612–94), the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (Hobbes, Thomas
) (1588–1679), and the Epicurean
) atomist (atomism
) Pierre Gassendi (Gassendi, Pierre
) (1592–1655)—as well as Descartes's replies. The second edition (1642) includes a response by the Jesuit priest Pierre Bourdin (1595–1653), who Descartes said was a fool. These objections and replies constitute a landmark of cooperative discussion in philosophy and science at a time when dogmatism was the rule.
is characterized by Descartes's use of methodic doubt
, a systematic procedure of rejecting as though false all types of belief in which one has ever been, or could ever be, deceived. His arguments derive from the skepticism of the Greek philosopher Sextus Empiricus
. 3rd century AD) as reflected in the work of the essayist Michel de Montaigne (Montaigne, Michel de
) (1533–92) and the Catholic theologian Pierre Charron (Charron, Pierre
) (1541–1603). Thus, Descartes's apparent knowledge based on authority is set aside, because even experts are sometimes wrong. His beliefs from sensory (perception
) experience are declared untrustworthy, because such experience is sometimes misleading, as when a square tower appears round from a distance. Even his beliefs about the objects in his immediate vicinity may be mistaken, because, as he notes, he often has dreams about objects that do not exist, and he has no way of knowing with certainty whether he is dreaming or awake. Finally, his apparent knowledge of simple and general truths of reasoning that do not depend on sense experience—such as “2 + 3 = 5” or “a square has four sides”—is also unreliable, because God could have made him in such a way that, for example, he goes wrong every time he counts. As a way of summarizing the universal doubt into which he has fallen, Descartes supposes that an “evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me.”
Although at this stage there is seemingly no belief about which he cannot entertain doubt, Descartes finds certainty in the intuition that, when he is thinking—even if he is being deceived—he must exist. In the Discourse
, Descartes expresses this intuition in the dictum “I think, therefore I am”; but because “therefore” suggests that the intuition is an argument—though it is not—in the Meditations
he says merely, “I think, I am” (“Cogito, sum”). The cogito (cogito, ergo sum
) is a logically self-evident truth that also gives intuitively certain knowledge of a particular thing's existence—that is, one's self. Nevertheless, it justifies accepting as certain only the existence of the person who thinks it. If all one ever knew for certain was that one exists, and if one adhered to Descartes's method of doubting all that is uncertain, then one would be reduced to solipsism
, the view that nothing exists but one's self and thoughts. To escape solipsism, Descartes argues that all ideas that are as “clear and distinct” as the cogito must be true, for, if they were not, the cogito also, as a member of the class of clear and distinct ideas, could be doubted. Since “I think, I am” cannot be doubted, all clear and distinct ideas must be true.
On the basis of clear and distinct innate ideas (innate idea
), Descartes then establishes that each mind
is a mental substance and each body a part of one material substance. The mind or soul is immortal, because it is unextended and cannot be broken into parts, as can extended bodies. Descartes also advances a proof for the existence of God. He begins with the proposition that he has an innate idea of God as a perfect being and then concludes that God necessarily exists, because, if he did not, he would not be perfect. This ontological argument for God's existence, originally due to the English logician St. Anselm of Canterbury (Anselm of Canterbury, Saint
) (1033/34–1109), is at the heart of Descartes's rationalism, for it establishes certain knowledge about an existing thing solely on the basis of reasoning from innate ideas, with no help from sensory experience. Descartes then argues that, because God is perfect, he does not deceive human beings; and therefore, because God leads us to believe that the material world exists, it does exist. In this way Descartes claims to establish metaphysical foundations for the existence of his own mind, of God, and of the material world.
The inherent circularity of Descartes's reasoning was exposed by Arnauld, whose objection has come to be known as the Cartesian Circle. According to Descartes, God's existence is established by the fact that Descartes has a clear and distinct idea of God; but the truth of Descartes's clear and distinct ideas are guaranteed by the fact that God exists and is not a deceiver. Thus, in order to show that God exists, Descartes must assume that God exists.
Descartes's general goal was to help human beings master and possess nature. He provided understanding of the trunk of the tree of knowledge in The World
, and Geometry
, and he established its metaphysical roots in the Meditations
. He then spent the rest of his life working on the branches of mechanics, medicine, and morals. Mechanics is the basis of his physiology and medicine, which in turn is the basis of his moral psychology. Descartes believed that all material bodies, including the human body, are machines that operate by mechanical (mechanism
) principles. In his physiological studies, he dissected animal
bodies to show how their parts move. He argued that, because animals have no souls, they do not think or feel; thus, vivisection, which Descartes practiced, is permitted. He also described the circulation (human cardiovascular system
) of the blood but came to the erroneous conclusion that heat in the heart expands the blood, causing its expulsion into the veins. Descartes's L'Homme, et un traité de la formation du foetus
(Man, and a Treatise on the Formation of the Foetus
) was published in 1664.
In 1644 Descartes published Principles of Philosophy
, a compilation of his physics and metaphysics. He dedicated this work to Princess Elizabeth (1618–79), daughter of Elizabeth Stuart
, titular queen of Bohemia, in correspondence with whom he developed his moral philosophy. According to Descartes, a human being
is a union of mind and body (mind–body dualism
), two radically dissimilar substances that interact in the pineal gland
. He reasoned that the pineal gland must be the uniting point because it is the only nondouble organ in the brain, and double reports, as from two eyes, must have one place to merge. He argued that each action on a person's sense organs causes subtle matter to move through tubular nerves to the pineal gland, causing it to vibrate distinctively. These vibrations give rise to emotions and passions and also cause the body to act. Bodily action is thus the final outcome of a reflex arc that begins with external stimuli—as, for example, when a soldier sees the enemy, feels fear, and flees. The mind cannot change bodily reactions directly—for example, it cannot will the body to fight—but by altering mental attitudes, it can change the pineal vibrations from those that cause fear and fleeing to those that cause courage and fighting.
Descartes argued further that human beings can be conditioned by experience to have specific emotional responses. Descartes himself, for example, had been conditioned to be attracted to cross-eyed women because he had loved a cross-eyed playmate as a child. When he remembered this fact, however, he was able to rid himself of his passion. This insight is the basis of Descartes's defense of free will
and of the mind's ability to control the body. Despite such arguments, in his Passions of the Soul
(1649), which he dedicated to Queen Christina
of Sweden (reigned 1644–54), Descartes holds that most bodily actions are determined by external material causes.
Descartes's morality is anti-Jansenist and anti-Calvinist in that he maintains that the grace
that is necessary for salvation
can be earned and that human beings are virtuous and able to achieve salvation when they do their best to find and act upon the truth. His optimism about the ability of human reason and will to find truth and reach salvation contrasts starkly with the pessimism of the Jansenist apologist and mathematician Blaise Pascal (Pascal, Blaise
) (1623–62), who believed that salvation comes only as a gift of God's grace. Descartes was correctly accused of holding the view of Jacobus Arminius (Arminius, Jacobus
) (1560–1609), an anti-Calvinist Dutch theologian, that salvation depends on free will
and good works rather than on grace. Descartes also held that, unless people believe in God and immortality, they will see no reason to be moral.
Free will, according to Descartes, is the sign of God in human nature, and human beings can be praised or blamed according to their use of it. People are good, he believed, only to the extent that they act freely for the good of others; such generosity is the highest virtue. Descartes was Epicurean in his assertion that human passions are good in themselves. He was an extreme moral optimist in his belief that understanding of the good is automatically followed by a desire to do the good. Moreover, because passions are “willings” according to Descartes, to want something is the same as to will it. Descartes was also stoic, however, in his admonition that, rather than change the world, human beings should control their passions.
Although Descartes wrote no political philosophy
, he approved of the admonition of Seneca (Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
4 BC–AD 65) to acquiesce in the common order of things. He rejected the recommendation of Niccolò Machiavelli (Machiavelli, Niccolò
) (1469–1527) to lie to one's friends, because friendship is sacred and life's greatest joy. Human beings cannot exist alone but must be parts of social groups, such as nations and families, and it is better to do good for the group than for oneself.
Descartes had been a puny child with a weak chest and was not expected to live. He therefore watched his health carefully, becoming a virtual vegetarian. In 1639 he bragged that he had not been sick for 19 years and that he expected to live to 100. He told Princess Elizabeth to think of life as a comedy; bad thoughts cause bad dreams and bodily disorders. Because there is always more good than evil in life, he said, one can always be content, no matter how bad things seem. Elizabeth, inextricably involved in messy court and family affairs, was not consoled.
In his later years Descartes said that he had once hoped to learn to prolong life to a century or more, but he then saw that, to achieve that goal, the work of many generations would be required; he himself had not even learned to prevent a fever. Thus, he said, instead of continuing to hope for long life, he had found an easier way, namely to love life and not to fear death. It is easy, he claimed, for a true philosopher to die tranquilly.
Final years and heritage
In 1644, 1647, and 1648, after 16 years in the Netherlands, Descartes returned to France for brief visits on financial business and to oversee the translation into French of the Principles
, the Meditations
, and the Objections and Replies
. (The translators were, respectively
, Charles d'Albert, duke de Luynes (Luynes, Charles d'Albert, Duke de), and Claude Clerselier.) In 1647 he also met with Gassendi and Hobbes, and he suggested to Pascal (Pascal, Blaise
) the famous experiment of taking a barometer up Mount Puy-de-Dôme to determine the influence of the weight of the air. Picot returned with Descartes to the Netherlands for the winter of 1647–48. During Descartes's final stay in Paris in 1648, the French nobility revolted against the crown in a series of wars known as the Fronde (Fronde, the
). Descartes left precipitously on August 17, 1648, only days before the death of his old friend Mersenne.
Clerselier's brother-in-law, Hector Pierre Chanut, who was French resident in Sweden and later ambassador, helped to procure a pension for Descartes from Louis XIV
, though it was never paid. Later, Chanut engineered an invitation for Descartes to the court of Queen Christina
, who by the close of the Thirty Years' War (1618–48) had become one of the most important and powerful monarchs in Europe. Descartes went reluctantly, arriving early in October 1649. He may have gone because he needed patronage; the Fronde seemed to have destroyed his chances in Paris, and the Calvinist theologians were harassing him in the Netherlands.
In Sweden—where, Descartes said, in winter men's thoughts freeze like the water—the 22-year-old Christina perversely made the 53-year-old Descartes rise before 5:00 AM to give her philosophy lessons, even though she knew of his habit of lying in bed until 11 o'clock in the morning. She also is said to have ordered him to write the verses of a ballet, The Birth of Peace
(1649), to celebrate her role in the Peace of Westphalia (Westphalia, Peace of
), which ended the Thirty Years' War. The verses in fact were not written by Descartes, though he did write the statutes for a Swedish Academy of Arts and Sciences. While delivering these statutes to the queen at 5:00 AM on February 1, 1650, he caught a chill, and he soon developed pneumonia. He died in Stockholm on February 11. Many pious last words have been attributed to him, but the most trustworthy report is that of his German valet, who said that Descartes was in a coma and died without saying anything at all.
Descartes's papers came into the possession of Claude Clerselier, a pious Catholic, who began the process of turning Descartes into a saint by cutting, adding to, and selectively publishing his letters. This cosmetic work culminated in 1691 in the massive biography by Father Adrien Baillet, who was at work on a 17-volume Lives of the Saints. Even during Descartes's lifetime there were questions about whether he was a Catholic apologist, primarily concerned with supporting Christian doctrine, or an atheist, concerned only with protecting himself with pious sentiments while establishing a deterministic, mechanistic, and materialistic physics.
These questions remain difficult to answer, not least because all the papers, letters, and manuscripts available to Clerselier and Baillet are now lost. In 1667 the Roman Catholic church made its own decision by putting Descartes's works on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum
: “Index of Prohibited Books”) on the very day his bones were ceremoniously placed in Sainte-Geneviève-du-Mont in Paris. During his lifetime, Protestant ministers in the Netherlands called Descartes a Jesuit and a papist—which is to say an atheist. He retorted that they were intolerant, ignorant bigots. Up to about 1930, a majority of scholars, many of whom were religious, believed that Descartes's major concerns were metaphysical and religious. By the late 20th century, however, numerous commentators had come to believe that Descartes was a Catholic in the same way he was a Frenchman and a royalist—that is, by birth and by convention.
Descartes himself said that good sense is destroyed when one thinks too much of God. He once told a German protégée, Anna Maria van Schurman (1607–78), who was known as a painter and a poet, that she was wasting her intellect studying Hebrew and theology
. He also was perfectly aware of—though he tried to conceal—the atheistic potential of his materialist physics and physiology. Descartes seemed indifferent to the emotional depths of religion. Whereas Pascal trembled when he looked into the infinite universe and perceived the puniness and misery of man, Descartes exulted in the power of human reason to understand the cosmos and to promote happiness, and he rejected the view that human beings are essentially miserable and sinful. He held that it is impertinent to pray to God to change things. Instead, when we cannot change the world, we must change ourselves.
The history of the original works and their early translations into English is as follows: Musicae Compendium
(written 1618, published 1650); Renatus Des-Cartes Excellent Compendium of Musick
(1653); Regulae ad Directionem Ingenii
(written 1628, published 1701); Le Monde de Mr Descartes; ou, le traité de la lumière
(written 1633, published 1664); Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison, & chercher la verité dans les sciences. Plus la dioptrique; les meteores; et la geometrie
(1637; A Discourse of a Method for the Wel-guiding of Reason, and the Discovery of Truth in Sciences
, 1649); Meditationes de Prima Philosophia
(1641; and its 2nd ed., with Objectiones Septimae
, 1642; Six Metaphysical Meditations; Wherein It Is Proved That There Is a God
, 1680); Principia Philosophiae
(1644); and Les Passions de l'âme
(1649; The Passions of the Soule
, 1650).Descartes's correspondence has been collected in Lettres de Mr Descartes: où sont traittées plusieurs belles questions touchant la morale, physique, medecine, & les mathematiques
, ed. by Claude Clerselier, 3 vol. (1666–67); and Correspondance
, ed. by Charles Adam and G. Milhaud, 8 vol. (1936–63, reprinted 1970). The standard edition of complete works is Oeuvres de Descartes
, ed. by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery, 13 vol. (1897–1913), which includes Descartes's correspondence and is available in later editions.Modern translations into English, many with valuable commentaries, include such selections as The Philosophical Works of Descartes
, trans. by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross, 2 vol. (1911–12, reprinted 1982); The Philosophical Writings of Descartes
, trans. by John Cottingham et al., 3 vol. (1984–91); Philosophical Letters
, trans. and ed. by Anthony Kenny (1970, reissued 1981); Descartes' Conversation with Burman
, trans. by John Cottingham (1976); Le Monde; ou, traité de la lumière
, trans. by Michael Sean Mahoney (1979), in English and French; Treatise of Man
, trans. by Thomas Steele Hall (1972); Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology
, trans. by Paul J. Olscamp (1965); Principles of Philosophy
, trans. by Valentine Rodger Miller and Reese P. Miller (1983, reprinted 1991); The Passions of the Soul
, trans. by Stephen Voss (1989); and Descartes: His Moral Philosophy and Psychology
, trans. by John J. Blom (1978).
Basic biographical sources are Descartes's own works and letters. Adrien Baillet, La Vie de Monsieur Des-Cartes
, 2 vol. (1691, reprinted 1987), is the major source, notwithstanding Baillet's apologetic bias and his fanciful embroidering of tales. Charles Adam, Vie & oeuvres de Descartes: étude historique
(1910); Gustave Cohen, Écrivains français en Hollande dans la première moitié du XVIIe siècle
(1920, reprinted 1976); and J. Sirven, Les Années d'apprentissage de Descartes, 1596–1628
(1928, reprinted 1987), are based on extensive original research. Also noteworthy are Cornelia Serrurier, Descartes: l'homme et le penseur
(1951; originally published in Dutch, 1930); Jonathan Rée, Descartes
(1974); Leon Pearl, Descartes
(1977); and Geneviève Rodis-Lewis, Descartes: His Life and Thought
(1998; originally published in French, 1995). Two other biographical works, published since Sirven and also based on extensive original research, are John R. Cole, The Olympian Dreams and Youthful Rebellion of René Descartes
(1992); and Richard A. Watson, Cogito ergo Sum: The Life of René Descartes
Expositions and criticisms of Descartes's philosophical doctrine began with his contemporaries and continue in the present day. Noteworthy examples are Benedictus de Spinoza, The Principles of Descartes' Philosophy
, trans. from Latin by Halbert Hains Britan (1905, reprinted 1974); Henri Gouhier, Les Premières Pensées de Descartes: contribution à l'histoire de l'anti-Renaissance
, 2nd ed. (1979), and La Pensée métaphysique de Descartes
, 4th ed. (1987); Jean Laporte, Le Rationalisme de Descartes
, 3rd ed. (1988); Geneviève Rodis-Lewis, L' Œuvre de Descartes
, 2 vol. (1971); Maxime Leroy, Descartes: le philosophe au masque
, 2 vol. (1929); Norman Kemp Smith, New Studies in the Philosophy of Descartes: Descartes as Pioneer
(1952, reprinted 1987); Willis Doney (ed
.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays
(1967); Anthony Kenny, Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy
(1968, reissued 1997); Ferdinand Alquié, Descartes
, new ed. (1969), in French
; Hiram Caton, The Origin of Subjectivity: An Essay on Descartes
(1973); Margaret Dauler Wilson, Descartes
(1978, reissued 1999); E.M. Curley, Descartes Against the Skeptics
(1978); Nicolas Grimaldi, L'Expérience de la pensée dans la philosophie de Descartes
(1978); Bernard Williams, Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry
(1978, reprinted 1990); John Cottingham, Descartes
(1986); Willis Doney (ed
.), Eternal Truths and the Cartesian Circle: A Collection of Studies
(1987); Geneviève Rodis-Lewis (ed
.), Méthode et métaphysique chez Descartes
(1987); Gregor Sebba, The Dream of Descartes
, ed. by Richard A. Watson (1987); and Theo Verbeek (ed
.), La Querelle d'Utrecht: René Descartes et Martin Schoock
(1988).Descartes's theology, ontology, and ethics are explored in Étienne Gilson, Études sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien
, 5th ed. (1984); Zbigniew Janowski, Index Augustino-Cartésien: textes et commentaire
(2000); Henri Gouhier, La Pensée religieuse de Descartes
, 2nd rev. ed. (1972); J.-R. Armogathe, Theologia cartesiana: l'explication physique de l'Eucharistie chez Descartes et dom Desgabets
(1977); Martial Guéroult, Descartes' Philosophy Interpreted According to the Order of Reasons
, 2 vol. (1984–85; originally published in French, 1953); and Jean-Luc Marion, Sur la théologie blanche de Descartes: analogie, création des vérités éternelles et fondement
(1981, reissued 1991), Sur l'ontologie grise de Descartes: science cartésienne et savoir aristotélicien dans les Regulae
, 2nd ed., rev. and expanded (1981, reissued 2000), and On Descartes' Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-Theo-Logy in Cartesian Thought
(1999; originally published in French, 1986). Also of interest are Roger Ariew, Descartes and the Last Scholastics
(1999); John Cottingham (ed
.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes
(1992, reissued 1995); Zbigniew Janowski, Cartesian Theodicy: Descartes' Quest for Certitude
(2000); John Marshall, Descartes's Moral Theory
(1998); and Vance G. Morgan, Foundations of Cartesian Ethics
(1994).Descartes the scientist and mathematician is treated in J.F. Scott, The Scientific Work of René Descartes
(1952, reprinted 1987); Stephen Gaukroger (ed
.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics, and Physics
(1980); Stephen Gaukroger, Descartes: An Intellectual Biography
(1995, reissued 1997); Dennis Des Chene, Spirits and Clocks: Machine and Organism in Descartes
(2001); Desmond M. Clarke, Descartes' Philosophy of Science
(1982); Daniel Garber, Descartes' Metaphysical Physics
(1992); Geneviève Rodis-Lewis (ed
.), La Science chez Descartes
(1987); and William R. Shea, The Magic of Numbers and Motion: The Scientific Career of René Descartes
(1991).Interpretative studies of Descartes's separate works include René Descartes, Discourse de la méthode
, text and commentary by Étienne Gilson, 6th ed. (1987); Jean-Marie Beyssade, La Philosophie première de Descartes: le temps et la cohérence de la métaphysique
(1979); Henri Gouhier, Descartes: essais sur le “Discours de la méthode,” la métaphysique et la morale
, 3rd ed. (1973); L.J. Beck, The Metaphysics of Descartes: A Study of the Meditations
(1965, reprinted 1979); Alexander Sesonske and Noel Fleming (eds.), Meta-meditations
(1965); Frederick Broadie, An Approach to Descartes' Meditations
(1970); Harry G. Frankfurt, Demons, Dreamers, and Madmen: The Defense of Reason in Descartes's Meditations
(1970, reprinted 1987); Richard B. Carter, Descartes' Medical Philosophy: The Organic Solution to the Mind-Body Problem
(1983); Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed
.), Essays on Descartes' Meditations
(1986); Roger Ariew and Marjorie Grene (eds.), Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies
(1995); and Richard A. Watson, Descartes's Ballet: His Doctrine of the Will and His Political Philosophy
Gregor Sebba, Bibliographia Cartesiana: A Critical Guide to the Descartes Literature, 1800–1960
(1964), is a definitive bibliography covering biographical and doctrinal books and articles. Also of note is Vere Chappell and Willis Doney (eds.), Twenty-Five Years of Descartes Scholarship, 1960–1984: A Bibliography
(1987).Richard A. Watson
* * *
Источник: Descartes, René